|
"Anyone in the market for a truly gripping read about tort lawyers should skip Grisham's novel and instead pick up Walter K. Olson's nonfiction book The Rule of Lawyers, a brilliant expose of the way courts are being overwhelmed by mass tort actions. " —Robert Lenzner Forbes
"In just ten chapters, Olson provides a clear, compelling analysis of class action litigation and the lawyers who press for it run amok. As the subtitle implies, the situation has transformed the justice system into a "just us" system, with the lawyers having their way, and undermining the rule of law in the U.S. Olson does a masterful job of presenting the complexities of the legal system in straightforward, nontechnical language. The Rule of Lawyers is a very important book: one to be read and shared with others." —Sunni Maravillosa Free-Market.net
"By taking on some the favorite cases cited by Nader and Smith— tobacco, gun, breast implant, lead paint and asbestos litigation—Olson demonstrates how trial lawyers are turning themselves into a Fourth, higher, Branch of government, without the constraints democracy imposes on the other branches." —Duane Freese Tech Central Station
“While the trial lawyers continue to prowl for the next big score, The Rule of Lawyers provides valuable ammunition for those who march under the banner of legal reform. Perhaps more important, it serves as a wake-up call to those who have long turned a blind eye and a deaf ear to the crisis of "jackpot justice" in our courts and the growing influence of trial lawyers in public office.” —Eric Shippers Engage
“Mr. Olson's engaging prose, for all its charm, is propelled by a sense of outrage at the abuses he describes: He slams his opponents onto the mat, lets them rise slightly in a daze and then slams them down again, round after round.” —David Price Wall Street Journal
"Olson's wry, amusing, libertarian take on the increasingly preposterous role that mass tort lawyers have assumed in our society—and in the funding of the Democratic Party—man not only spur many Democrats to reshuffle their standard talking points on those issues, but may even afford them some guilty, cant-piercing pleasures along the way." —Roger Parloff, Legal Times
|